Logo Background RSS

Advertisement

Medical Acupuncture. What is it?

  • And what’s the difference between Medical Acupuncture
    and Traditional or Chinese Acupuncture?

    As more and more people are looking into receiving acupuncture for their health complaints, it has become that much more important to know what type of acupuncturists are in practice and what type of qualifications they have.

    Acupuncture is a component of a complete medical system called Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). Acupuncture originated in China several thousand years ago.

    ACUPUNCTURE TRAINING

    Acupuncture is performed by licensed acupuncturists with a minimum of 3-4 years of study. This is a rigorous program of acupuncture and traditional Chinese medicine that includes intense study and an internship. Credentials can be seen after their name with an L.Ac.

    Most often when you see the initials L.Ac., you can be confident that the acupuncturist had some serious training of at least a few years.

    Medical Acupuncture is performed by a doctor (MD) or other licensed health care professional such as a chiropractor, dentist, and physical therapist.

    Medical acupuncture was created for these health practitioners (MD, DC, etc.) without the lengthy study that licensed acupuncturists (L.Ac.) take. In fact, some of these courses only require 100 hours of acupuncture study!

    Often, when you see the initials MD or DC or any initial without an L.Ac., more often than not, they have had much less acupuncture training.

    In fact, it is in the nature of Medical Acupuncture to offer a less comprehensive course of acupuncture study to their trainees. Some states offer a minimum of ONLY 100 hours of acupuncture study while licensed acupuncturists (L.Ac.) have over 3,000 hours.

    If you have received acupuncture by an MD, DC, or someone not fully trained like an L.Ac. and have not benefited from the treatment, you should consider going to a licensed acupuncturist (L.Ac.) to experience the full potential that acupuncture has to offer.

Advertisement

25 Comments
  1. #1 Jamie Koonce, L.Ac.
    December 6th, 2008 at 4:00 pm

    Traditional Chinese Medicine — including the use of acupuncture and herbology — is too often treated as “folk medicine” among the biomedical community and in the mass news media. This is similar to the idea of “all natural” on product labels. It is recognized as something that is safe and requires no specialized knowledge in order to use effectively. Unless the conceptualization of TCM as a layperson’s knowledge that can be learned by reading a couple of books is eradicated, we will continue to see MDs and DCs actually believing and convincing the public of the fallacy that they are “experts” in TCM. The future of our profession lies in our ability to demonstrate academic integrity and a unified TCM jargon in published research.

    Reply

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  2. #2 Sohee Bidol-Lee
    December 7th, 2008 at 1:54 pm

    As an MD considering training in acupuncture at the Helms Institute, I’m very interested in this discussion. I’ve been in practice for 5 years now, and I’m often frustrated by the limitations of Western medicine, by the tendency to rely on prescription drugs to solve problems. This is what led me to consider learning more about alternative therapies. Because the majority of my patients still have some skepticism when it comes to alternative therapies, I was hoping that in my own education, I could further educate my patients to see that sometimes there is a bigger picture to healing than what just one side can offer.

    In all honesty, I am not well-versed in the insurance issues regarding acupuncture. Nor could I fully appreciate the frustration that many licensed acupuncturists may have in seeing their expertise being impinged upon by others who they feel are radically undertrained. I may feel similarly about an individual who graduated from medical school, but decided not to take the traditional residency training, but instead went directly into practice. Nonetheless, I still do think it’s possible to come to some level of skill and effectiveness with experience.

    The last thing I want is to learn something that would be ultimately detrimental of even dangerous to my patients. If anyone is willing to share, I would like to hear about specific examples you’ve seen of MD’s certified in acupuncture performing “terrible treatments.” I’ve tried to look into the pneumothoraxes caused by acupuncture needles, but could find little information about who was performing the treatments and really what the details around it were.

    Thanks, and I hope to keep discussion going,
    Sohee

    Reply

    Mike Bowser Reply:

    @Sohee Bidol-Lee,
    Many doctors share your frustrations about practice, which is why finding a good program is important. One really good option is to enroll in any one of the accredited acupuncture/OM programs and take evening classes. The school will most likely have you take only the necessary acupuncture/TCM courses (about 2 years worth).

    There are many programs in the LA area, not far from UCLA and the Helms program. I would suggest you look into Yosan, Emperor’s college, SCUHS, South Baylo and Samra. All of these programs have websites. For example, Emperor’s college has many good offsight internship ops, which include the Freeman Memorial hospital, for their doctorate students (DAOM).

    Reply

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  3. #3 tom chi l.ac.
    December 22nd, 2008 at 11:28 pm

    the MD problems I’ve seen have to do with causing patients to go into spasm and sending tem to the hospital.

    Also, being incompetent, just because you can, is fraud.
    MD’s kill 100,000 patients a year with medical mistakes but presumably delude 100 million with lousy medical (and save lives about 10% of the time).

    So, get competent training, then practice with your head held high.

    Reply

    Burton Kent Reply:

    @tom chi l.ac.,

    It’s far more than 100,000. In 1998, the Journal of the American Medical Association published a study showing that about 106,000 deaths a year were due to properly prescribed medications. These deaths occurred in hospitals where you’ll find all the medical technology you could ever want to prevent this. (By the way, the AMA Journal is the most prestigious medical journal on the planet.)

    If you read the study closely, you’ll also see that they probably excluded all deaths where drugs were a contributing factor. Unless the drug directly caused the death it wasn’t counted.

    And this doesn’t include deaths that occurred from “adverse drug events” outside the hospitals, which is probably far more.

    Just the drug deaths in hospitals were the #4 killer of Americans, after heart attacks, cancer and diabetes.

    It has become much, much worse since 1998. Ever notice how in the past 10 years, drug advertisements have taken over the media? These drugs are the newest ones out there. They’re also the most dangerous. We’d like to think that these drugs have been properly tested in clinical trials, but about half are found to have serious side effects that weren’t discovered during trials. Many of these side effects are lethal or crippling. So essentially, users of the “new and improved” drugs are part of a science experiment that can ruin their lives.

    It’s very likely that properly prescribed and used prescription drugs are the #1 killer in the US.

    Reply

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  4. #4 Lisa Hanfileti
    January 7th, 2009 at 9:59 am

    This really seems like a disingenuous attempt to divide our professional community rather than find common ground so that patients can receive the very best health care services. The idea that there is a “turf war” between MDs and LAcs is perpetuated by limited thinking, misleading information, and NOT getting the facts on BOTH sides.

    I have presented the facts about medical acupuncture for anyone who really wants to understand this issue.

    I know my view is unpopular and it is easier for LAcs to point fingers and blame rather than look at the deeper complexities surrounding practitioner training. I hope you tone down the rhetoric and offer not only real facts, but creative ideas designed to strengthen the entire acupuncture profession.

    After all, acupuncture belongs to the people, not the practitioners.

    Lisa Hanfileti, LAc
    Insights-For-Acupuncturists.com

    Reply

    Drew Reply:

    @Lisa Hanfileti,
    I couldn’t agree more Lisa! Thank your for a logical point of view that focuses on moving forward and providing comprehensive care.

    Also, I often put out the unpopular viewpoint of letting practitioners know that I know several Medical acupuncturists that I consider fantastic practitioners…

    Drew Taylor MS, LAc, ATC

    Reply

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  5. #5 Elie
    January 8th, 2009 at 10:36 am

    Hi lisa, I enjoy much of your practice building articles but I disagree with you on this one.

    This isn’t about a “fight” between L.Ac’s and MD’s. where we can just hug and be OK. It’s much deeper than that. You said it’s about “patients receiving the very best health care services”. But as an L.Ac. do you really believe patients are getting the best acupuncture services from “medical acupuncturists” that only have 300 hours of training?

    You mention on your site about the “not less than 200 hours”. OK, so it’s 300! All the other hundreds of hours and years of clinical experience you mention are not true. Those extra hours are OPTIONAL if they want to become “Board” certified. The facts are that they can practice acupuncture with 300 hours and that is mentioned on the dabma.org that you mention AND I have seen in medical offices where I have worked.

    According to the Helms Institute who say they have trained 85% of physicians in acupuncture, have 2 programs. 300 hours and a “less comprehensive” 220 hours.

    This is not safe for patients and at the same time gives acupuncture a bad name from all too often the terrible treatments performed by “medical acupuncturists” that I have witnessed over the years and many other L.Ac.’s have too.

    Reply

    Lisa Hanfileti Reply:

    @Elie, Hi Elie,

    I too value the work you are doing for acupuncturists and my different perspective should in no way be perceived as disrespect for you (or any of the other acupuncturists contributing to this website).

    My goal in presenting the facts about medical acupuncture, including a detailed comparison of training courses and hours to help provide detailed information so everyone can be informed about the differences between how MDs and LAcs arrive at their respective acupuncture training and why the WHO differentiated the different standards. (Whether it is right or wrong, good or bad, these are the facts, and I think a good starting place for discussion.)

    I also detail why medical acupuncture is not TCM and how different the styles are.

    The only study that I know of that compared MD-trained and TCM-trained practitioners concluded that the 2 groups assessed the patients based on entirely different theoretical models, but came up with almost the exact same points to treat! (Kalauokalani D; Cherkin DC; Sherman KJ (2005) Clin J Pain; 21(5):406-11 “A comparison of physician and nonphysician acupuncture treatment for chronic low back pain.”) I think that is fascinating! The next question is, which type of practitioner gets the better results? THAT is the kind of fact-based information we should be going after instead of posting an inflammatory anecdotal story of an acupuncturist’s grandmother’s friend from work getting a punctured lung by an MD. (Seriously, there is not a single fact in there and I do not view this as an honest attempt to accurately inform the public.)

    I am sure this will be an ongoing discussion. I appreciate your views and look forward to learning more.

    Peace,
    Lisa

    Reply

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  6. #6 Joyce Avimeleh
    January 9th, 2009 at 10:36 am

    Nice of you to run to the defense of M.D.’s. Now can you get health insurance companies to pay for our treatments? Most of them will pay M.D.’s to do acupuncture, but not L.Ac.’s. How does that “strengthen the entire acupuncture profession”? It not only discredits us, but essentially renders us unable to earn a living in a professional that we dedicated 3000 hours and $40,000 to learn.

    Reply

    Lisa Hanfileti Reply:

    @Joyce Avimeleh,
    Hi Joyce,

    I am not running to anyone’s defense, just sharing what I have learned. I think we all still have a lot to learn (including me) if we can remain open minded.

    I am trying to help us ALL understand the facts, rather than rely on rumor. You do not have your facts correct and that is a problem, especially when you are repeating them as facts to other acupuncturists and everyone gets “fired up”.

    It is not true that “most [insurance companies] will pay M.D.’s to do acupuncture, but not L.Ac.’s.” By far the majority reimburses for licensed acupuncturists, but there are several that require an MD. (This can be challenged if you are diligent.) But the bigger problem with your anger is that you are lumping insurance companies and MDs together and then blaming all MDs for the actions of the insurance companies. MDs as a whole hate dealing with insurance companies as much as we do and do not set their policies.

    If you could just step back for a moment and look you might see that MD acupuncturists are fighting some of the exact same battles we are: reimbursement, acceptance (by their colleagues who laugh at them and by hospitals who prevent them from practicing it for “liability reasons”), and earning “a living wage” as you call it.

    Can you for a moment see that there is SOME common ground? Perhaps if we communicated with these MDs we might be able to make changes that benefited us all? Where this is being done (OCOM and OHSU for example), amazing things are happening. I am not saying we put our heads in the sand (Joyce Edwards, below, makes a good point), just that we take notice of all the complexities and be smart.

    The biggest mistake I think LAcs make is to complain western medicine doesn’t accept acupuncture, then some MDs come along and really think it has merit and want to learn it to help their patients, so they go through the accepted training (good or bad, it’s what they have), and then we attack them for not doing enough and “stealing our medicine” and taking our money… As MDs struggle against narrow minded administrators to get acupuncture accepted in hospitals (please read my personal report on my website under the heading of “The Economics of Medical Acupuncture: Financial, Social, & Political Implications”), do you really think MDs are going to try to help us get hospital privileges too if we are complaining about how bad they are? Again, what if we stepped back and looked at what we have in common and tried to join forces in order to advance the acupuncture profession as a whole? I think it’s worth considering.

    As LAcs we still have so much work to do! We need to stand on our own two feet, get acupuncture legalized in every state, get a national credential (instead of LAc, RA, CA, OMD, DOM, my gosh no wonder the public is confused!), get a national certification exam (the NCCAOM exam is not accepted in CA), and standardize our own training (some programs don’t teach herbal medicine.)

    We have an amazing profession and unbelievable value to offer people. This world has never been more in need of practitioners of mind-body medicine and holistic health care practitioners. I believe we can OWN this field if we put our heads together and our best efforts forward.

    Reply

    Mike Bowser Reply:

    @Lisa Hanfileti,
    Defense might not be the right term, but certainly you have gone out of your way to sell us on the idea that abbreviated programs in acupuncture should be accepted.

    I have not heard why you think a MD/DO should be allowed this and a DC not but for me that is splitting hairs. You mention facts and that is always a good place to start.

    Fact, the legislation that started licensing acupuncture for MD/DO, did so for research sake and not independent practice. The issue of setting up professional standards has not been undertaken by the allopathic community and until they decide to include this in their basic education you will not have this acceptance. Maybe they need to take up this issue within their own profession.

    Fact, these abbreviated programs are unaccredited except by continuing education dept at various colleges. There is no scrutiny or standards within these.

    Fact, there is no supervised clinical practice.

    Fact, the predominate theories are based upon TCM and not western medicine. This further underscores the importance of having a solid theoretical TCM education.

    Fact, there is no requirement for continuing education with these abbreviated programs. If a provider is going to use any medical therapy, they need to keep up with developments in the profession.

    Fact, the acupuncture profession once operated from a position of unaccredited programs but we are far from that now.

    What you are asking us to do is reverse our profession and the gains we have made in order to take in doctors that do not want to operate within their own established practice norms.

    Lastly, I have not heard you say why our profession should be the only healthcare profession to allow for lesser training. In the interest of improving the acupuncture profession, let’s raise the bar, not lower it.

    Reply

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  7. #7 Joyce Edwards,L.Ac
    January 9th, 2009 at 6:57 pm

    Lisa,
    I feel you may have opened up a can of worms with your review and defence of medical acupuncturist. Being some what of a purest, I feel that if you want acupuncture treatment you go to an acupuncturist, my back adjusted-go to the chiropractor, surgery or drugs-go to the MD. I really don’t understand why people have to blur professions. I have read many things on your website and have found them insightful but you being an acupuncturist I don’t understand your defending MDs. MDs have a lot of power in the political field and have tried to wipe out other alternate medicine professions. Naturopaths for one and Homeopaths for another. In some states acupunctuirst are still fighting for their right to practice. Unfortunatly, by using the term of medical acupuncture it gives the American public the idea that it is superior to a person who pracitces TCM since the public is so trained to think that Western medicine is far superior to Eastern medicine. As for the educational systems, I feel that a 300 hour course work is not going to truly give anybody the essence of acupuncture. I have Chiropractor friends that have taken this 300hr course. Although the treatment may be effective, it is nothing but cookbook treatments. By blurring the lines of practice we will never be able to get hospital privileges or expand our scope of practive to do herbal medicine.

    Reply

    Lisa Hanfileti Reply:

    @Joyce Edwards,L.Ac,

    Hi Joyce,

    I appreciate your honest feedback and concerns. You are right that we have to have a keen eye on history and what other professions have been squashed by the AMA. That is why I think we need to be smart about what we do and how we do it. If LAcs could see that MD acupuncturists are fighting the AMA right now for the right to practice acupuncture in their own hospitals, you might see we have a common fight. To be clear, MD acupuncturists are looked down upon by their MD colleagues and AMA political group. We should not lump all MD acupuncturists in with those MDs who want to limit acupuncture.

    Here is the one thing I find very interesting about this entire argument over training… you said about DCs who were trained with the 300 hour course, “Although the treatment may be effective, it is nothing but cookbook treatments.” If the treatments are effective with only 300 hours of video training, shouldn’t we be marveling at how amazing that is?! Either those are some awesome 300 hours of training or acupuncture is just so powerful that is works even at the hands of a cookbook practitioner!

    Maybe both are true… I don’t know. If I saw any studies (real research, and not the anecdotal “friend of a patient” stuff) that showed acupuncture was less effective or was more dangerous in the hands of a trained MD acupuncturist, I would be the first to demand changes. Right now what I see is that Board Certified MD acupuncturists have significantly more training than any other programs.

    I do not know what the DC training is and I wonder if a lot of the concern is over DCs specifically? They tend to be aggressive marketers and maybe that has been a complicating factor in this whole MD acupuncture discussion. Maybe someone can offer some facts on that? I really do not know the DC training specifics, and on the west coast, it does not seem to be a big issue.

    Again, thanks for your comments. I certainly appreciate a purist!

    Reply

    Mike Reply:

    The issue non-LAc acupuncture education is now being discussed by our national acupuncture association, the AAAOM. They, along with the help of the WHO, have come to recommend that 1500 hours (1000 practical and 500 clinical) be set as a limit, for other healthcare providers wanting to include acupuncture in their practices. This seems about the right amount of training and I would support such an effort.

    The abbreviated programs currently being touted are unaccredited by the US Dept of Education and therefore are bogus as far as any educational worth. Hiding behind them as if they represent actual, legitimate standards is laughable and makes those who try to push the diplomat credentials as dishonest salesmen. We can include snake oil here if need be.

    No one wants to be made a fool of and yet that is exactly what many uneducated healthcare providers do not realize they make themselves and their healthcare profession when they participate. Far more credibility will be had when professions show respect for other professions be getting licensed in the other’s paradigm, as opposed to dishonestly taking what others do and attempting to lower the bar on standards.

    The chiropractic, naturopathic and physical therapy communities seem to be the biggest players in this charade, with a great deal of self-delusion, although we hear that some MD/DO also want to play this game. The game is greed, and from this the patient is the real loser.

    Tougher standards of training, public disclosure of acupuncture education, and revamping of state laws are needed to correct this problem.

    Reply

    Mike Bowser Reply:

    @Lisa Hanfileti brings up many interesting points but the conclusions are not necessarily accurate.

    Fist, the WHO recommends that “full training” of 1500 hours be undertaken if the physician is to “practice independently, treating the various conditions for which patients are commonly treated by acupuncture practitioners.” The limited training is suggested for scientific research and Western clinical practice. This does not answer the question of whether the MD/DO needs further clinical supervision. Let’s not forget that the original intent with allowing MD/DO the right to practice in state law was for acupuncture research and not independent practice.

    Second, the acupuncture profession is not and should not be on the same side as a “rogue profession” that seeks to undermine its own established entrance norms. Yes, we do have them. Graduation from an accepted school, a Master’s degree in the profession as well as passage of a state licensing exam. Many other’s have posted really good examples of the hypocrisy so I will not repeat them here.

    I am glad that some LAc’s are getting the op to work in hospital settings, as this does help us to strengthen our profession. I can say that I see us unifying over the issue of under-educated practitioners.

    Lastly, I would like us all to think about the Hawaii statutes that do NOT allow for any professional entry until the person fulfills the SAME requirements to become Licensed Acupuncturists.

    Every other profession has a level playing field when it comes to practice, so why are we being treated differently? Don’t the patients deserve the best?

    Reply

    Burton Kent Reply:

    Hi Lisa,

    If you read between the lines, you’ll see that just about every study that claims acupuncture doesn’t work (or is placebo) is a condemnation of medical acupuncture. Almost every study that show acupuncture DOES work supports “purists.” Here’s why:

    The studies that show acupuncture is little better than placebo are almost always “cookie cutter” treatments. I’ve read hundreds of studies, and almost without fail, the ones that don’t work, are cookie cutters. And I say “almost” because I really need to go back and reread everything so I can say “always.”

    The exception is “interesting” interpretations. For example, acupuncture reduces the active -most painful period- of labor in half (2 hours instead of 4), but doesn’t reduce overall labor (34 hours instead of about 36). The study’s authors admitted the former, but placed more emphasis on the latter. Somehow I think women in labor have the opposite priority! :-)

    It’s just too time consuming and expensive to actually do a proper diagnosis, so they just go with a generalized treatment program. The study designers decide to treat, say, headaches, with points culled from various successful treatment protocols.

    To me, this is the equivalent of treating every headache – migraines, tension, brain tumors, sinus, etc. with aspirin. Sure, aspirin might work a little bit for some conditions, a lot for others. Wouldn’t it be more effective to actually match the treatment to the condition?

    The studies that do show acupuncture works almost always involve acupuncturists being allowed to diagnose before choosing points.

    Now, I have no clue if the “medical acupuncturists” actually learn to do a proper diagnosis. If they do, great. If they don’t, they’re just perpetuating the one-size-fits all model of pushing pills, but instead they’re pushing needles.

    (Folks, I’m NOT an acupuncturist, I’ve just read more acupuncture studies published in Western medical journals than anyone else I know. Enough to recognize a definite pattern I’ve written about here: http://www.acupunctureclinicmarketing.com/acupuncture-works/)

    Lisa, your page is excellent. It shows that the docs have far more training than just 300 hours, and that latching onto that 300 hours figure is a distortion and a mistake. Thanks for that, it really brings balance to the discussion. However, they seem to indicate that there’s not much training in diagnosis. None, actually.

    Thanks also for explaining that these doctors are trying to do the right thing, and are facing uphill battles. I just hope they realize they might not know as much about what they’re doing as they think.

    Frankly, I think Dr. Tan’s methods, with their emphasis on diagnosis with achi (tender) points might address some of these diagnosis concerns, but that’s another discussion (and I’m still not an acupuncturist).

    Reply

    sdacudoc Reply:

    The MDs and DCs in Florida can practice with 100 hours of “training.” I put quotes around the word because it is a total joke. Now the American Chiropractic Association offers board certification for their 300 hour endorsed program. I guess they want to keep up with the 300 hour board certified MDs. Can you imagine if an LAc began to practice western medicine with 300 hours of weekend seminars? Can you imagine if an LAc took a 100 course in spinal manipulative therapy? It would be an ugly situation, not only for the practitioner but more importantly the patients.

    Reply

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  8. #8 Andy Rosenfarb, L.Ac.
    January 10th, 2009 at 12:02 pm

    I’m not really sure what is meant by “acupuncture is for the people…” Whould that mean that Chiropratic and conventional medicine are “for the people” as well? If this were the case the there would be no need for any formal educational – which does not seem like a good solution.

    The solution is clear – unification within our profession and raising (not lowering) the standards of Acupuncture and the Oriental Medicinal.

    This is the first time I have ever heard of an acupuncturist defend the Helms’s program – that in and of itself is concerning.

    Reply

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  9. #9 Yang
    January 22nd, 2009 at 11:45 pm

    Maybe us Acupuncturists should start to lobby for spinal manipulations? I wonder how that Chiro in his letter to Dr. Chi would feel.

    Yes acupuncturists have been doing spinal manipulation long before Palmer or Osteopathy

    “TCM/Acupuncturists have be doing spinal manipulation for over 3000 years” Thank you, and yes it is called Tuina

    The Chiro goes nuts when anyone wants to do spinal manipulaiton? Even in Texas they fought to have Tuina taken out of the Acupuncturists scope of practice, as they complained that in some cases, it involved the spine? Not very fair is it Chiro?

    As far as a Chiro or anyone else calling themselves Acupuncturists with a weekend certificate. I would say that is fraud. Pure and simple

    I would also encourage any patient that gets treatment from a weekend acupuncturists to persue a class action lawsuit. You could win and win big time. Esp with these people misleading you about their training. The national acupuncture association sets the standard for training for us acupuncturists and it is not 0 to 300 hours of training

    As far as making outright rude and mean comments about MD/DO killing over 100,000 people, I must say that I am disturbed by this language. I would then ask you how many lives do they save? Please do not lower yourself to this level, even though I am not happy about them doing acupucnture with the little training they have, I will say that I am thankful we have them. They do a lot of good in saving peoples lives. They are the true heros who give everything in order to save lives. Have you ever visited a pediactric oncology unit? I think you might have a deeper respect for MD/DO if you did as well as every other healthcare provider working endlessly to save a child.

    As for the Chiro, you need to stick to what you are trained to do, “Remove Subluxations” You are not acupuncturists and never will be until you go to school to become one. That is not to take anything away from you. Just think how you would feel, if you were us and other professions were trying to claim to be chiropractors without paying the price you paid and worked so hard to get.

    We need to protect our profession at all costs and in a civil manner.

    Reply

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  10. #10 tom chi
    January 25th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    Yummy! Real vs. Hobbyist Acupuncturists. There are a handful of “medical acupuncturists” who deserve much respect for doing extensive work with acupuncture. The rest sadly, due to lack of training and lack of practice, quack.. This is along post but way fun and packed with… uh.. poignancy!!

    Here’s a press release I issued when some chiropractors recently wanted certification in New York.
    I received this (below) letter from a chiropractor. I answered (my answer follows her letter). I hope this makes the point. P.s. I never heard back from her but was glad I took the time to answer.
    best wishes and please do enjoy the press release and the two followup letters,

    tom chi, l.ac (NY) Dr.Acu (RhI).

    ———Press Release 3 days prior to the vote on Chirporactors doing Acupuncture in New York State——————–

    SNAP! CRACKLE! POP! Untrained Chiropractors Doing Acupuncture!
    Insane or Just Plain Fraudulent Asks Top Acupuncture Physician
    SOUTH FALLSBURG, N.Y., April 8, 2008 — Just when you thought it was safe to get acupuncture yet one more group of medical practitioners fights for the right to be shamelessly under qualified. This time it’s chiropractors.

    For licensed acupuncturists it’s relatively ordinary to “cure” asthma, ADD, hot flashes, post-stroke injury, digestive problems, acne, difficult and chronic pain, shingles, autism and more says Master Acupuncturist Tom Chi, a Doctor of Acupuncture (RI) and NYS Licensed Acupuncturist.

    Chi, who has practiced for 25+ years and done over 120,000 treatments, says acupuncture is the new medicine and will become the first choice for non-emergency medicine within the next 5 to 10 years.

    “Real acupuncturists have a minimum of 4000 hours of training and must qualify for National Board Certification to become licensed,” says Chi, “and every year we see a new group of irresponsible practitioners who want to become pretend acupuncturists and have the lobbying power to accomplish it.”

    This year it is New York State chiropractors that are seeking the right to practice acupuncture with just 300 hours of training. Bill #S590 incredibly would allow chiropractors to call themselves acupuncturists, a possibility that sends chills down the Licensed Acupuncturists spine!

    Members of ASNY, the NYS acupuncture association, say it is the power of lobbyists to promote greedy unqualified practitioners from podiatrists to chiropractors who want to follow the example of allopathic doctors who lobbied for the right to practice acupuncture with just 300 hours. “My patients who’ve been treated by medical doctors complain about lack of results and lack of disclosure about their incomplete training. Many consider it outright fraud,” says Dr. Chi.

    Chi has treated over 100 medical doctors, members of congress, even a chief medical officer of Pfizer Pharmaceuticals; the largest drug company in the world. He has performed acupuncture anesthesia while on staff at Catskill Regional Hospital and his patients have come from as far away as Lichtenstein and Venezuela after having tried western medicine and many other therapies.

    His view is that a medical revolution is taking place and that acupuncture is emerging as the preferred therapy. Press coverage such as the 1998 Discovery Magazine article showing brain scan evidence which clearly validates acupuncture continues to support claims of amazing results for a broad range of health care problems.

    Unfortunately say acupuncturists, those with the power to manipulate the legislature want to skip the real training and hang up a shingle. Chi exclaims, “This is unacceptable and borders on criminal. Our efforts need to go into making Medicare and Medicaid pay for acupuncture. It’s time! It’s important! Let your representatives know that essential standards must not be bypassed for the enrichment of unethical practitioners. We are in an evolving Healthcare Revolution,” relates Chi. “Acupuncture repeatedly delivers results and HUGE healthcare savings! On Wednesday the legislature needs to say NO to poorly trained healthcare practitioners posing as real acupuncturists!”

    Media inquiries:
    DrChi@FixPainNow.com
    845.798.9995
    Dr. Tom Chi

    ——-Here is the letter from a chiropractor to me following the issue of the press release——————

    Dear Dr. Chi,

    In the interest of creating harmony, I would like to open dialog with you concerning collaborative education and patient care.

    Just read your article on line. As a practicing chiropractor, who has enjoyed using acupuncture for 15 years of my 25 year career, I am curious if the hostility you have is generated by your own personal territorial issues; or if you have some substantial claim to the fact that 300 hours of training for a trained physician is not “enough”? The standards of licensure for acupuncture are relatively new in the US and Canada. Having searched high and low for a program in which to train and gain more proficiency, I have had to turn to training courses outside the US as the current educational structure for any physician who is interested in incorporating acupuncture into their practice is non existent, except in our own turf, (ie: chiro and medical schools). The supposed “keepers” of the acupuncture knowledge are self appointed, as is true in all new paradigms being integrated into any culture. The history of chiropractic, as foiled against the wave of the allopathic consciousness over the last century, might serve as a lesson for the “Licensed Acupuncture” community.

    When MDs started getting certified to do manipulation in weekend classes there was a huge uproar in the chiropractic community. What time has borne out is that those MDs doing manipulation actually have given greater credence to the efficacy of structural realignment and the importance of finesse and focused training.

    I think you will find your fire would be more creative in the long run if you created alliances rather than pointing fingers and creating divisions.

    I am curious…….where did you get your training? How would you like to see acupuncture integrated into the American health culture? And is fear running your life or is your Liver yang just flaring?

    Sincerely and with kindest regard!

    (name witheld)

    ———–Here is My Reply————————-

    Dear Dr. J,

    You are indeed a thoughtful being and your letter is greatly appreciated, your conjecture about the liver could be a natural conclusion

    The good news is, I’m not angry, nor is my liver fire flaring. I’ve been one of those fortunate ones to have great health throughout life and to enjoy a natural contentedness

    Hard to cover all the territory, let me try….

    My experience with both allopaths and chiropractors practicing acupuncture is one of patient disappointment. The results are not there in most cases. It’s unfair to a patient to not understand pulse diagnosis, TCM medical theory etc. This does not come in 300 hours. Beyond understanding is assimilation and mastery.

    When I speak to those with this miniscule training they routinely have a “gimme those needles I’m already a doctor” attitude and don’t even realize that it’s a detriment not a bonus that they use their other medical training when doing acupuncture.

    Hobbyist acupuncturists are a nuisance. People need immediate tangible lasting results. In the clinic a patient with reflux can usually count on that being gone within 1 to 3 treatments. I’ve had autistic children speak after 6 treatments with one needle each time (and acknowledge other people as existing, give a high five, etc.).

    Children with asthma who use an inhaler everyday then go an entire year and throughout soccer season without needing it once after just 4 or 5 treatments.

    Post-stroke patients aphasic and losing hearing/vision on one side, dragging one leg, same 4 to 6 treatments, dancing in the waiting room.

    These are not the results of minimally trained practitioners.

    As to training I am particularly ignorant about what is available. I do know that Bastyre and others have brought together a number of disciplines under one roof. It’s also quite possible to go to acupuncture school and CLEP out on bio/phys courses. The other courses are not and should not be optional. There is no magic understanding that comes from practicing another form of medicine because acupuncture is a complete medical system in itself with very little overlap to allopathy or chiropractic.

    The “keepers of the acupuncture knowledge” to my understanding are actually people who’ve studied the knowledge and based the real training programs, testing, etc., upon that knowledge.

    As to my training I am a graduate of a 3-year acu school and also a 2.5 year acu school. I did advanced acupressure type techniques though using the esoteric hand-sensitization techniques from the Ving Tsun Kung Fu (created by a Chinese nun and made famous by Bruce Lee.) I have evolved something which I call Soft-Tissue Reprocessing which eliminates the adhesions/injuries which cause most back, neck shoulder, knee pain etc.

    So, for a patient with or without disc problems who is ambulatory and suffers intense pain throughout the day, this patient usually will have immediate (or near immediate) tangible, lasting results with difficult and chronic pain. The injury will not come back as it will no longer exist. This is a huge leap from what we normally see with therapy.

    As someone who has dedicated herself to learning I’m certain you have pursued your understanding of the acupuncture well beyond what we normally see with allopaths or chiropractors. There is also a Medical Acupuncture society with a number of very dedicated allopaths who’ve filled in the pieces and done good work.

    Still, these are the exceptions. It’s not okay to wing it and self-train after the fact of licensing. If I was making the legislation anyone could become licensed simply by passing the national boards with a caveat!

    No One would become licensed just by demonstrating a knowledge of the point location and theory but would have to Prove results in a clinic treating patients and through evaluation show that they can indeed accomplish a meaningful level of actual healing. NCCAOM feels differently. They feel one is not qualified to take those boards without the 4000 hour training.

    There are a lot of poorly performing acupuncturists even with the schooling and this would remedy that problem.

    People come first so if you’ve read Overdosed America or through your chiropractic training you may know the sham of most allopathic non-emergency treatment.

    Chiropractors performance by my experience from Fla (100 hours training and allopaths 0 hours) is just poor. People who say they tried acupuncture and it doesn’t work have most often been needled by allopaths or chiropractors.

    Though it’s in answer to your questions it’s way long-winded and I will pause here.

    As to creating harmony. Not necessary, I felt that you simply brought your personal harmony to my door. Very nice.

    And living in fear? It’s a funny thing. I’ve done over $300,000 in unbilled or severely reduced treatments over the last five years since I moved to the mountains (a poor rural area). I just can’t say no. It wouldn’t hurt if insurers paid for medicine that works.

    If I didn’t have other sources of income to pay for my patient’s health care, I’d be in big trouble.

    Here’s my recent press release (one page) where I tried to stir up a reaction about insurance, you may get a kick out of it. And yes, it’s hypey concerning yers truly. (the URL is just below this letter)

    Finally, I love that you wrote to me. You are great. Thoughful without b.s.

    I’d love to hear from you anytime.

    tc

    ——-This is a Fun Press Release about Acu & Insurance——-
    http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/02-20-2008/0004758980&EDATE=

    ( Warning! Doctors, Insurers Hold Patients Hostage!
    While drug companies act like an occupying force, doctors and insurers run a dysfunctional cartel, often intentionally denying effective treatment to patients!)

    Reply

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  11. #11 Michael Cote
    August 1st, 2010 at 12:31 am

    I think the confusion lies in the definition and concept of acupuncture. Many people, including MDs and medical researchers, think it is merely the insertion of fine needles into specific sites on the body.

    However, the definition of acupuncture should be the following: the insertion of fine needles into specific points on the body which are manipulated a precise manner the technique and selection of which is based on traditional Chinese medical diagnoses.

    On a side note, I’ve taken three years of allopathic medical sciences including, medical physiology, pathophysiology, pharmacology, microbiology, and biochemistry. That is far more training than MOST physiotherapists, ND, or MDs receive in traditional Chinese medicine and acupuncture. Does that mean I should be considered qualified to practice allopathic medicine? It would at least be fair then wouldn’t it?

    Reply

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  12. #12 sdacudoc
    August 2nd, 2010 at 5:57 am

    I must say I enjoy all this dialogue about training. I absolutely love Tom’s term “hobbyist acupuncturist.” I recently watched a youtube video of a chiropractor in Florida performing acupuncture because he is “certified.” Now I know why we get their patients! If the act of sticking needles in a person is the definition of acupuncture, then this chiro makes the clear case for professionally trained acupuncturists. I’ve seen tailors with better needle technique. I have also had several patients come to see me who had MD hobbyist acupuncture.

    In one particular case this hobbyist doctor used a very interesting technique. Six needles in total (all local, no distal points), and the patient was in-and-out in 15 minutes. Brilliant! The patient was exponentially worse after the treatment.

    We need to continue to educate, and promote our profession to public; this is the only way to minimize this nonsense. Unfortunately, the hobbyist DCs and MDs with their “Acupuncture Hobbyist Certifications” will never go away.

    Reply

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  13. #13 Doreen
    December 4th, 2010 at 10:21 pm

    As a Doctor or Traditional Chinese Medicine I certainly agree that most of the so-called medical acupuncture training is insufficient and renders acupuncture into some sort of cook book remedy that might work for 30% of the population. On the other hand, I think TCM docs should stand on our own merits and not waste time “exposing” the shortcomings of others. The fact is that there are TCM docs who have a very poor understanding of bio-medicine and in turn overlook serious problems that should be red flags. We need to be careful of taking higher ground on this issue.

    Reply

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  • Trackback: The Best Acupuncturist in New York « Alban Acupuncture & Chinese Herbs Clinic, New York City Trackbacks
  • Leave a Comment